Drinking vodka and kool-aid with rufees. They’re still idiots…

That didn’t take long.

As we observed throughout the campaign, Barack Obama gave indications that his election would mean a return to the September 10 mentality, a national-security outlook marked prominently by its lack of seriousness about the terrorist threat. In choosing Eric Holder to be his attorney general, President-Elect Obama has taken a step toward confirming those misgivings. CLICK HERE FOR MORE ON THIS IDIOT ERIC HOLDER AND HIS PATHETIC RECORD…

Where are they coming from and why you should worry. Why are people voting for a man involved in so much corruption, we can’t keep up with all of it! This is not change, this is 100 times worse than what we already have. ObamaMorons really need to come to their senses.

By SCOTT W. JOHNSON
Obama: Failing to put up basic blocks against fraudulent giving.
October 27, 2008

Barack Obama has proved the greatest fund-raiser of all time by a long shot. His campaign has raised more than $600 million - $150 million in September alone. But the campaign has also failed to adopt standard protections against fraudulent giving.

The average contribution to Obama in September was just under $86. And federal law only requires the disclosure of identifying information for contributions in excess of $200. Campaigns must keep running totals for each donor and report them once they exceed $200.

The Federal Election Commission says the Obama campaign has reported well over $200 million as coming from contributions of $200 or less. Only a small portion of that sum is attributable to donors the Obama campaign has disclosed.

No presidential campaign has ever before received such a gargantuan sum of money from unidentified contributors.

The campaign’s records reveal big contributors with names like “Doodad Pro” (employer: “Loving,” profession: “You”) and “Good Will” (same employer and profession). Both donated via credit card. Other reports have suggested that some donations come from overseas - raising the question of whether Obama is accepting donations from foreigners, another violation of federal law.

All of which prompted an enterprising citizen to test the controls put in place to enforce compliance with federal campaign law by the Obama and McCain campaigns. Last Thursday, he decided to conduct an experiment.

He went to the Obama campaign Web site and made a donation under the name “John Galt” (the hero of Ayn Rand’s novel “Atlas Shrugged”). He provided the equally fictitious address “1957 Ayn Rand Lane, Galts Gulch, CO 99999.”

He checked the box next to $15 and entered his actual credit-card number and expiration date. He was then taken to the next page and notified that his donation had been processed.

He then tried the same experiment on the McCain site, which rejected the transaction. He returned to the Obama site and made three more donations using the names Osama bin Laden, Saddam Hussein and Bill Ayers, all with different addresses but the same credit card. The transactions all went through. By Saturday, he’d reported that the transactions had all posted to his credit-card account.

Others repeated “John Galt’s” experiment last week, giving to Obama under such fictitious names as Della Ware, Joe Plumber, Idiot Savant, Ima BadDonation (with a Canadian bank card) and Fake Donor.

What accounts for the Obama campaign’s acceptance of these fraudulent donations? Most merchants selling goods and services use the basic Address Verification System that screens credit-card charges for matching names and addresses. (It can also screen cards issued by foreign banks.) The McCain campaign uses AVS and provides a searchable database of all donors, including those who fall below the $200 threshold. The Obama campaign apparently has chosen not to use the AVS system to screen donations.

“Della Ware” contacted The New York Times to report her experience contributing under a fictitious name and address (”12345 No Way”) to the Obama campaign, while her contribution was rejected by the McCain campaign. Times reporter Michael Luo verified “Della Ware’s” account and reported it online at the Times’ campaign blog. But Luo missed the story’s point.

“To be fair to the Obama campaign,” he wrote, its “officials have said much of their checking for fraud occurs after the transactions have already occurred. When they find something wrong, they then refund the amount.”

But the Obama campaign is running a system that complicates the discovery of “something wrong.” It has chosen to operate an online contribution system that facilitates illegal falsely sourced contributions, illegal foreign contributions and the evasion of contribution limits.

Obama backers making such contributions may not be worried that “something wrong” will be detected if they have no intention of complaining about it.

According to journalist Kenneth Timmerman, the Obama site did not ask for proof of citizenship until just recently - in contrast not just with McCain but also with Hillary Clinton. Sen. Clinton’s presidential campaign required US citizens living abroad to fax copies of their passports before it would accept donations. By contrast, foreign donors to Obama can just use credit cards and false addresses.

Why has the Obama campaign chosen to operate without the basic automated credit-card controls that would prevent or hamper fraud and illegal contributions? Has it made a conscious decision to assist the evasion of federal campaign law or worry about it after it has had the use of the money?

It’s hard to see any other motive.

Scott W. Johnson is a Minneapolis attorney and contributor to the blog Power Line (power lineblog.com).

This is a disgrace.This is disgusting. Click here for story.

What about the convicted murderers who vote? Democrats should be ashamed of themselves and the next time someone calls a democrat ‘unamerican’ don’t you dare try to argue that statement. When you’re more concerned with registering felons and throwing away the U.S troops ballots in the trash, that’s unamerican. Supporting ACORN is unamerican. (look up democracy you liberal idiots) The democratic party is a disgrace.

Recently in New Jersey, a convicted murderer got released from prison and stayed clean for several years, therefore giving him the right to vote for the first time in 30 years. (The idiot mayor celebrated this guy and gave him an award) What about the victim he murdered with a screwdriver? What if he were still alive like he should be and wanted to vote republican? Why doesn’t his vote count even when he is deceased if the murderer who took his life is able to vote. Records and family members should be able to cast his vote for him. He would have been enjoying his retirement years right now with his family. So this dirtbag gets an award, cancels out your vote, (he is supporting Obama) and committed murder. This man should never be allowed to vote! No convicted felon should be.

Yes Barack Obama is a shameless crook, we established this yesterday, if you want to know why, read the article.

Barack Obama or How America Learned to Stop Worrying and (started to) Love A Shameless Crook…

Many people believe that if John McCain wins, there will be race riots all over the country. I would love to see all the white people beating up other white people in white neighborhoods. Can you imagine burning stores, overturned cars and fistfights in San Francisco, Princeton, Berkeley and Cambridge? How will there be race riots when most of McCains voters are white, but so are Obama’s supporters? If Obama is half white, a quarter arab and kenyan, where will the justification of a race riot come from if he were to lose? What if Obama loses because he is an inexperienced liberal with a shady background, terrible ideas and a record of funding and encouraging voter fraud? Will sore losers really riot just because Americans don’t want to elect an anti-American into office?
Let’s look at the good side of a race riot. White liberals and white conservatives rioting will be really funny to watch. For one, liberals are sissies and the conservatives probably won’t even show up. Blacks will just watch and laugh their asses off as they witness several whimpy liberals trying to overturn a ford escort and throw a molotov cocktail like a girl as it bounces short of it’s target. What if a liberal is pressured into breaking out the window of a Starbucks? Oh, the peer pressure!
If people are going to be so ignorant as to start a riot because their candidate lost, even with the help of millions of votes from voter fraud and massive amounts of brainwashing and white guilt; that’s too bad! Rioting might be good for the economy as members of public safety will get tons of overtime. Corrections officers will be busy in the jails, the fire and police departments will be busy, as will lawyers and emergency rooms. Construction to rebuild all the damaged structures will keep builders busy as insurance companies get hammered. But don’t worry, our government will just bail them out as they raise our taxes even more. So let them riot! Don’t cave into people who riot, as they are thugs and menaces to society, so fight fire with fire. All those idiots do is riot and destroy their own neighborhoods and businesses anyway. Imagine people rioting, because a guy that was bad for the country, didn’t get elected! If Barack Obama doesn’t get elected, it will be the best thing for this country. Billions of dollars of your money will be saved and America can start making a comeback. Anyone wanting to riot should be doing it right now on the steps of congress where the biggest thugs in America are. The people ruining this country and running it into the ground while stealing your money are Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Maxine Waters, Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Chuck Schumer, Charlie Rangel. All democrats and a few sellout republicans.
If you have ever been to an Obama rally, you could see the what type of idiots he attracts, which is already a major red flag. Threatening to riot says something about the Obama supporters and why they support him. Did you ever here that republicans will riot if McCain loses? No, you won’t because most all conservatives are civilized, patriotic,hard working, tax paying, law abiding good people.
I promise you ObamaMorons, you will regret voting for Obama if he wins. Don’t riot just yet, give it some time. Under Obama, the country will self destruct on its own, we don’t need you doing it.

Notice the studder…he he he uh uh uh and then the bullshit ‘out’ of his answer?